Products · Work simulations

The work is the interview.

Candidates read a realistic brief, recommend an action, and answer follow-up questions. Your team sees how they think, not just what they claim.

Book a demo

See how candidates approach the work.

Realistic tasks, follow-up questions, and evidence your team can review.

Work simulation / Customer success manager Illustrative
Your brief / 01

Make the case.

A customer plans to launch across three teams in six weeks. Early testing shows low adoption. Recommend what to change before expanding.

PrioritySustained adoption
ConstraintSix-week deadline
Your taskRecommend next steps
AI role-play partner

Evidence you can inspect

See the evidence behind a rating.

Review the response, scoring criterion, and rationale together.

  • Cited candidate evidence
  • Explicit scoring criteria
  • Documented human review
Decision record · Jordan Davis Illustrative
Judgment · work simulation

Manages rollout risk

4/5
“I’d pilot with one team first. That delays the full rollout, but lets us test adoption before committing more teams.”
Role-play response · 02:14–02:28

Proposes a limited pilot and weighs it against rollout speed.

Criterion · judgment

Weighs consequences before committing.

3 / Meets

Identifies a relevant risk and a workable action.

4 / Strong

Explains trade-offs and proposes a reversible test.

Rating rationale: proposes a limited pilot and explains the trade-off with rollout speed. Follow up on success criteria.

Review history · illustrative
  1. Candidate response captured

    Work simulation · response 03

  2. Rating linked to evidence

    Judgment · rubric version 1.2 · 4/5

  3. Reviewer confirmed rating

    A. Morgan · rationale retained

  4. Follow-up documented

    Ask how the candidate would measure pilot success.

Example record. Hiring decisions remain with your team.

Side by side

Same brief. Different judgment.

Two candidates with similar résumés answer the same scenario. Their recommendations, and how they hold up under pushback, show the difference a résumé can't.

Customer success manager / Renewal risk Illustrative

The briefA key account's usage fell 40% after a price change. Renewal is in 30 days. What do you recommend?

Candidate A Candidate B
Recommendation

Hold the price. Book a usage review with their ops lead to find what stopped working before the renewal call.

Offer 20% off the renewal to keep them.

Under pushback"Their CFO says price is the problem."

Then I'd ask what they'd cut at the old price. If usage stays low, a discount only delays the churn.

Then I'd go to 30%.

Rubric

Level 4Diagnoses before acting and names the trade-off.

Level 2Acts on the symptom without a diagnosis.

Work simulation questions

A work simulation, sometimes called a work sample, asks candidates to do a realistic slice of the job: read a brief, make a recommendation, and explain it. Instead of judging what a résumé claims, your team reviews how the candidate actually approaches the work.
Each response is rated against explicit, job-related criteria agreed before candidates begin. Every rating links to the part of the response that supports it, and a member of your team reviews and confirms it.
No. The AI runs the role-play and organizes the evidence. Hiring decisions remain with your team, and each review is documented.
Well-designed work samples closely reflect the tasks of the job, and applicants often see them as fair. We review content with subject-matter experts and monitor results for adverse impact, which means testing whether outcomes differ across groups.
Any role whose work can be described in a brief: customer success, sales, operations, management, and technical roles. We build each task from your role's requirements rather than a generic template.

See what yourcandidates can do.

Book a demo

Let's talk about your role

Get a tailored quote.

Tell us about your hiring. We'll recommend an assessment approach and scope.

Use your work email so we can follow up.
Which assessments are you exploring? Select any that apply.
Expected candidates per year