Candidate integrity
Assess demonstrated ability with evidence you can inspect.
Set clear rules for AI use, inspect potential integrity concerns, and keep hiring decisions with your team.
- 01 / SET EXPECTATIONS
Make permitted use clear.
Independent, AI-assisted, and agentic tasks require different conditions. Define permitted tools and assistance before the assessment begins.
- 02 / IDENTIFY CONCERNS
Surface signals for review.
Review signals of possible copying, impersonation, or unauthorized assistance. Available checks depend on your deployment.
- 03 / REVIEW EVIDENCE
Review integrity flags in context.
Review the relevant assessment record and context. An integrity flag alone does not establish misconduct or justify automatic rejection.
In context
A flag is a question.
Candidates know monitoring is on before they begin. Anything unusual lands on their record as a flag, and a person on your team reviews it and records the decision.
- Clear notice to candidates
- No video, images, or biometric data stored
- A person reviews; nothing is auto-rejected
Assess AI skills in context.
When AI is part of the work, evaluate how candidates direct it, check its output, and take responsibility for the result.
- Permission
- Evidence
- Review